The Treason Trial of Aaron Burr

In the months between and including May and September, in 1807, Aaron Burr was hear by the Supreme Court in Virginia on the aim of deception against the United States. During the period of 1804 to 1807, Burr allegedly move some(prenominal) overt ventures, which are numberions, that may be innocent in themselves, but in combination with the intentions and results of that act, become criminal actions. The rill was about treason, which the Constitution defines as levying war against [the United States], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort, (Art. III, Sect. 3) and the pursuit moldiness prove that Burr committed the overt act with the software documentation of two witnesses, for the treason conviction to stand. In this trial, Burrs actions outside of the quote of Virginia have no bearing on the overt act of assembling troops to levy war against the United States, and thence the majority of his admissible actions occurred on Blennerhassets Island i n Virginia. (Doc 108) Although the prosecution do a strong case for Burrs guilt, the differentiation between his intentions and his actions, his primer coat as an American patriot and the lack of concrete evidence, sensation must conclude that Aaron Burr is non abominable of treason. He perhaps was til now the victim of a large political conspiracy to rid him of all prestige, honor and legacy.

        The prosecution tried to prove that Burr used his power to put in an troops of men to conquer New Orleans, then Mexico and last represent a refreshful nation composed of the occidental Americ an states and Mexico. The fault in their arg! ument is that his actions do not unavoidably point directly towards this conclusion. It is true that Burr wrote garner and even discussed a new war with Spain and the formation of a new nation, If you want to get a full essay, differentiate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay